Paid2026-04-22
25 You Call This a Harness?
This concept has been exploding in popularity for a while now. I've been following it, but I remain unconvinced. Now, let me explain why.
In my view, a harness is nothing more than a superficial shield, a massive defensive screen.
Previously, when AI results were poor, there were only two directions for attribution: either I didn't use it well, or the AI wasn't capable enough. Now, with the concept of a 'harness,' there's a third direction—the harness wasn't built properly. This third party stands neither with the human nor the AI; it is suspended perfectly in the middle. Poor results? The harness wasn't built right. No one can find fault with that. This isn't "incompetent subordinates" or a "poor model"; it's a "lack of barracks, tents, and supplies"—of course it's not working.
This is exactly why everyone loves this concept; it's far too convenient as a shield.
However, there is indeed a real change...
25 You Call This a Harness? This concept has been exploding in popularity for a while now. I've been following it, but I remain unconvinced. Now, let me explain why. In my view, a harness is nothing more than a superficial shield, a massive defensive screen. Previously, when AI results were poor, there were only two directions for attribution: either I didn't use it well, or the AI wasn't capable enough. Now, with the concept of a harness, there's a third direction—the harness wasn't built properly. This third party stands neither with the human nor the AI; it is suspended perfectly in the middle. Ef
Purchase required to continue
This is a paid article. After signing in, your purchase will be unlocked automatically.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.
Leave a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.