58 If you think of people as agents, many things will make sense. If I am an agent, you are also an agent, and everyone is an agent. Under this assumption, if you look at it one by one, many questions will become very reasonable. Everyone is born with different IQs and different schemas. The archetype of each Agent is different, which is the so-called innate talent. I really can't do high-precision scientific research, because my basic model may be an open source model of at most 32B, while top scientists may have a large model with trillions of parameters.
58 If you think of people as agents, many things will be explained. If I am an Agent, you are also an Agent, and everyone is an Agent. Under this assumption, if you look at it one by one, many questions will become very reasonable. Everyone is born with different IQs and different schemas. The basic model of each Agent is different, which is the so-called innate talent. I really can't do high-precision and cutting-edge scientific research, because my basic model may be an open source model of at most 32B, while top scientists may have a large model with trillions of parameters, which is very powerful. Therefore, the first difference between people lies in the basic model. People will be limited by innate conditions throughout their lives, and schema is one of the most important innate conditions. Let’s discuss it further. Some people's basic model is a Mini or Flash model, which does not support thinking, so the response is very fast, but...
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.